Gentoo Archives: gentoo-desktop-research

From: dams@×××.fr
To: gentoo-desktop-research@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-desktop-research] One research problem we could research
Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2003 14:44:15
Message-Id: m2r81mjwoq.fsf@krotkine.idm.fr
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-desktop-research] One research problem we could research by foser
1 foser <foser@g.o> said:
2
3 > On Thu, 2003-10-09 at 16:09, dams@×××.fr wrote:
4 >> If I see correctly, the things that makes ugly fonts :
5 >>
6 >> - bad looking fonts
7 >> - missing fonts (so it uses not suited ones)
8 >> - badly configured xft*/fontconfig
9 >> - software not using last freetype/xft ...
10 >>
11 >> ( feel free to add reasons if I missed som)
12 >>
13 >> So, to clarify, we could :
14 >> - run some test to see if fonts are ugly in common use in different languages
15 >> (I'll do some test cause I have a fresh gentoo)
16 >
17 > Here you already have a problem, the perception of font quality differs
18 > per-person and language. Some people really dislike AA (requires
19 > different fonts to be good), others use different types of displays,
20 > etc. And not latin language users usually know that they need extra
21 > packs to have decent support, don't expect anything non-latin to look
22 > good by default atm.
23
24 yeah, that's a big issue actually, but that is related to the i18n problem.
25 That is, there is no step in the installation to choose your localization, so
26 that everything takes it in account. pauldv told me it requires changes in
27 portage.
28
29 For the subjective way of testing, of course you are right, but you can test
30 gentoo by default, then other distro by default, or windows or other OS by
31 default (for those who have them). So for the same person, you'll be able to
32 say : this is better than that...
33
34 That's only theoric, because that involve a lot of testing (test gentoo, 2
35 other distros, windows and macos) and multiple testers (from various
36 locations).
37
38 Maybe we could ask non western testers to help.
39
40 >
41 >> - go through default available fonts (after having emerged kde and gnome), and
42 >> list the ugliest ones
43 >
44 > Again this is mostly a personal thing and it currently also depends on
45 > how you install xfree (this is in flux).
46
47 in flux ?
48
49 >
50 >> - check the fontconfig, xft configurations
51 >> - list known software that doesn't use the good font systems.
52 >
53 > That is not something up to us really, i don't feel it is our duty to
54 > make legacy applications look good, what matters to me is to get a
55 > current desktop (KDE/GNOME/XFCE4) reasonably ok/consistent looking
56 > fontwise (for as far as it isn't).
57
58 hmm, what is our duty then? what are the applications that we should check the
59 look? In addition, I don't want us to correct them, but only to test them, see
60 if a problem is general or only on 3 ebuilds, sadly used by a big amount of
61 people.
62
63 >
64 >> Whith that done we'll be able to see where the problems are, wnd decide if we
65 >> want to :
66 >> - wait
67 >> - try to get new fonts (many additional set of fonts by default)
68 >> - change font configuration
69 >> - change software so that they use latest technology (I have seen in the past
70 >> some patchs to make this and that use freetype2, I think OpenOffice had such a
71 >> patch, but I thougt it was in the main now)
72 >
73 > It uses freetype2 allright, but it's own copy.
74 >
75
76 ok
77
78 >> In addition, we can think of making font managment easy for the user. (I wrote
79 >> the font managment tool for mandrakeLinux, he had some working features, but
80 >> uses old font tools).
81 >
82 > Ehm, no please. Config defaults should be good enough, users should not
83 > be exposed to this via another GUI. Gnome already has a sufficient font
84 > settings panel and ways to install fonts, so does KDE to my knowledge. I
85 > don't like more ways to set the same thing on the same level (in this
86 > case on GUI level), it is confusing.
87 >
88 >> btw do we have i18n/fonts gurus @ gentoo?
89 >
90 > a few i18n wannabees.. but they're not the most active devs. I'm
91 > supposed to be the font guru cause i've handled bugs/updates in these
92 > things for some time and did most of the xft2 move coordination/work.
93
94 good ! hello guru :)
95
96 >
97 > Although they are connected, setting up fonts has little to do with
98 > i18n.
99
100 well, I'm looking for the way to see if the fonts look right in various
101 language. We can ask volunteers to do that, but it'll take time. If one person
102 has good knowledge of i18n he might already cover 80% of validation
103
104 --
105 dams
106
107 --
108 gentoo-desktop-research@g.o mailing list

Replies