From: | Jon Portnoy <avenj@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | Matthew Kennedy <mkennedy@g.o> | ||
Cc: | gentoo-dev@g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo internal structure | ||
Date: | Sat, 22 Nov 2003 07:32:14 | ||
Message-Id: | 20031122073212.GA1639@cerberus.oppresses.us | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo internal structure by Matthew Kennedy |
1 | On Sat, Nov 22, 2003 at 01:06:05AM -0600, Matthew Kennedy wrote: |
2 | |
3 | > I suppose I am dismayed that we are failing to promote free software |
4 | > over proprietary software. |
5 | |
6 | We are promoting giving users a choice. What we are failing at is trying |
7 | to force them into using free software. |
8 | |
9 | Quick poll of people reading this thread: Would you like to see the |
10 | removal of nonfree software from the tree? That means things like |
11 | vmware, the java packages, etc. |
12 | |
13 | Or perhaps someone should start a poll in the forums in Gentoo Chat |
14 | about it. |
15 | |
16 | -- |
17 | Jon Portnoy |
18 | avenj/irc.freenode.net |
19 | |
20 | -- |
21 | gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo internal structure | Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo internal structure | Stewart Honsberger <blkdeath@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo internal structure | Peter Ruskin <Peter.Ruskin@×××××××××.com> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo internal structure | Paul Varner <gentoo-dev@××××××××××××.org> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo internal structure | Donnie Berkholz <spyderous@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo internal structure | Matthew Kennedy <mkennedy@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo internal structure | Andrew Cowie <andrew@×××××××××××××××××××.com> |