Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Jon Portnoy <avenj@g.o>
To: Matthew Kennedy <mkennedy@g.o>
Cc: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo internal structure
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2003 07:32:14
Message-Id: 20031122073212.GA1639@cerberus.oppresses.us
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo internal structure by Matthew Kennedy
1 On Sat, Nov 22, 2003 at 01:06:05AM -0600, Matthew Kennedy wrote:
2
3 > I suppose I am dismayed that we are failing to promote free software
4 > over proprietary software.
5
6 We are promoting giving users a choice. What we are failing at is trying
7 to force them into using free software.
8
9 Quick poll of people reading this thread: Would you like to see the
10 removal of nonfree software from the tree? That means things like
11 vmware, the java packages, etc.
12
13 Or perhaps someone should start a poll in the forums in Gentoo Chat
14 about it.
15
16 --
17 Jon Portnoy
18 avenj/irc.freenode.net
19
20 --
21 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo internal structure Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo internal structure Stewart Honsberger <blkdeath@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo internal structure Peter Ruskin <Peter.Ruskin@×××××××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo internal structure Paul Varner <gentoo-dev@××××××××××××.org>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo internal structure Donnie Berkholz <spyderous@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo internal structure Matthew Kennedy <mkennedy@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo internal structure Andrew Cowie <andrew@×××××××××××××××××××.com>