| 1 |
On Tue, 5 Dec 2017 18:02:01 -0500 |
| 2 |
Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> The problem is that with current policies if somebody in Comrel/etc |
| 5 |
> had evidence to the contrary they would not be able to refute such a |
| 6 |
> denial. My example wasn't of wltjr specifically (at least not to my |
| 7 |
> knowledge), but it just goes to the point of why having these sorts of |
| 8 |
> things hashed out on the mailing lists on the first place. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
For the record and reading assumer's. All my actions were in public, |
| 11 |
basically on mailing lists starting with -nfp long ago. All action taken |
| 12 |
against me was in public visible on my developer bug. I have never |
| 13 |
communicated with ComRel former DevRel in private. Or had any action |
| 14 |
taken against me for anything I did in private. It was always public. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Any private information regarding me from 08 till today was generated |
| 17 |
within Gentoo and does not involve me. If any exists. With the |
| 18 |
exception of -core back in the day. Which again is a list, visible to |
| 19 |
all devs then. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Sorry and no more from me. I just feel given how I am portrayed, |
| 22 |
spoken of, action taken against, etc. I must clarify some things for the |
| 23 |
public record. Which even despite all my actions being in public. |
| 24 |
People still assume because research and thinking for yourself takes |
| 25 |
time. Time I do not expect anyone to expend. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
William L. Thomson Jr. |
Archives