1 |
On Saturday, December 3, 2016 1:56:40 PM EST Brian Dolbec wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> Well, It does give back some. I know there are times patches are |
4 |
> pushed to gentoo from them. |
5 |
|
6 |
Yes, and they employ a couple current and former devs. At least one quite core |
7 |
|
8 |
> Plus we get financial support from them |
9 |
> via the Google Summer Of Code. It has been pointed out recently that |
10 |
> the majority of our available funds have come from the GSOC. Not only |
11 |
> that, but it also helps us get new developers to work with and further |
12 |
> Gentoo projects. |
13 |
|
14 |
GSoC is controversial. They did not do it for Gentoo 1 year, I think 2015. |
15 |
Also it has lead to a bunch of projects started that are not used. One I am |
16 |
not sure why is not used, euscan, as its highly beneficial. Others seemed to |
17 |
have fallen off rather than become integrated into Gentoo or lived on as |
18 |
projects of their own. I could be wrong on a few, but last I checked that was |
19 |
the case for most. |
20 |
|
21 |
As for the main financial resource for Gentoo that is another thing semi off |
22 |
topic for this list. I may have brought it up on -nfp years ago. In a nutshell |
23 |
unless Gentoo spends money, and has plans to use money to further development. |
24 |
Which in turn benefits others. There is not much motivation for people to |
25 |
donate to Gentoo. |
26 |
|
27 |
There is also the charitable donation and write off aspect. Which they may be |
28 |
able to do. But since Gentoo has never received official 501c6 status or any |
29 |
from the IRS. I am not sure if companies or anyone can actually write off a |
30 |
Gentoo donation. May be moot for individuals, but not for large businesses |
31 |
with stringent accounts and standards to meet. |
32 |
|
33 |
-- |
34 |
William L. Thomson Jr. |