| 1 |
On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 19:31:54 -0800 Donnie Berkholz |
| 2 |
<dberkholz@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
| Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 4 |
| > On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 12:13:33 -0800 Donnie Berkholz |
| 5 |
| > <dberkholz@g.o> wrote: |
| 6 |
| > | Which part of GLEP 23 does it break? Please show me the text. |
| 7 |
| > |
| 8 |
| > Cut the crap, Donnie. We all know you're not that stupid, so stop |
| 9 |
| > pretending you are. |
| 10 |
| |
| 11 |
| How is it stupid to ask that you cite actual text from a policy when |
| 12 |
| you say I'm violating it? I think this makes the third time I've |
| 13 |
| asked now without ever seeing any concrete evidence. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
You make *the entire GLEP* unworkable. Now every user who wants to |
| 16 |
cover their ass legally has to go through and check every single one of |
| 17 |
those identical licences one by one. That's something that's supposed |
| 18 |
to be done centrally, by the people who maintain the packages. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
| I've read through GLEP 23 a few times now and frankly I'm sick of |
| 21 |
| dealing with licensing. If I gave a crap about it, I'd be using |
| 22 |
| Debian. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Debian would work well for you. They like the whole "if it isn't |
| 25 |
explicitly forbidden you can get away with it" thing. It's kinda the |
| 26 |
opposite of Gentoo's "don't be stupid" approach. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
| 30 |
Mail : ciaranm at ciaranm.org |
| 31 |
Web : http://ciaranm.org/ |
| 32 |
as-needed is broken : http://ciaranm.org/show_post.pl?post_id=13 |
Archives