Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] ACCEPT_RESTRICT for questionable values of RESTRICT
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:59:23
Message-Id: 1168469560.11192.46.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] ACCEPT_RESTRICT for questionable values of RESTRICT by Jakub Moc
1 On Wed, 2007-01-10 at 23:02 +0100, Jakub Moc wrote:
2 > > The name of the GLEP is even RESTRICT=unattended... not
3 > > FEATURES=unattended...
4 >
5 > And how's that in contradiction? Why can't a user stick 'unattended'
6 > into FEATURES instead of having to care about yet another variable?
7 > Sticking RESTRICT=unattended into ebuild will make the ebuild
8 > unavailable to the user until he removes that from his FEATURES. What's
9 > the problem?
10
11 OK. I'm done. I honestly can't even comprehend how you're not getting
12 this, and I don't have the patience to continue discussing this without
13 getting quite hostile. The only thing I can possibly gather from this
14 is you're intentionally being fucking dense, so it's not worth my time.
15 How is it that you can ignore half an email and only respond to
16 something out of context and then still fuck *that* up?
17
18 --
19 Chris Gianelloni
20 Release Engineering Strategic Lead
21 Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
22 Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee
23 Gentoo Foundation

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies