Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Jakub Moc <jakub@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] ACCEPT_RESTRICT for questionable values of RESTRICT
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:06:18
Message-Id: 45A5628A.7030602@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] ACCEPT_RESTRICT for questionable values of RESTRICT by Chris Gianelloni
1 Chris Gianelloni napsal(a):
2 > On Wed, 2007-01-10 at 19:06 +0100, Jakub Moc wrote:
3 >> Don't see how's userpriv related here; also the original idea was to
4 >> stick FEATURES=unattended (or non-interactive or whatever else) into
5 >> portage, instead of inventing new variables to handle this, AFAICR.
6 >
7 > Wow.
8 >
9 > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0052.html
10 >
11 > The name of the GLEP is even RESTRICT=unattended... not
12 > FEATURES=unattended...
13
14 And how's that in contradiction? Why can't a user stick 'unattended'
15 into FEATURES instead of having to care about yet another variable?
16 Sticking RESTRICT=unattended into ebuild will make the ebuild
17 unavailable to the user until he removes that from his FEATURES. What's
18 the problem?
19
20 --
21 Best regards,
22
23 Jakub Moc
24 mailto:jakub@g.o
25 GPG signature:
26 http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E
27 Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E
28
29 ... still no signature ;)

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies