| 1 |
Ned Ludd wrote: [Mon Jan 29 2007, 09:50:28AM CST] |
| 2 |
> > Then it should be offered to the 8th person, at which point either |
| 3 |
> > he/she will then refuse the nomination and it's offered to the 9th. |
| 4 |
> > Rinse and repeat. |
| 5 |
> > If we run out of nominees then we'll need another election. |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Agreed. #3 |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> >From my POV having a new election potentially over and over is a waste |
| 11 |
> of time and resources. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
My only qualm with this approach is whether or not we then risk |
| 14 |
promoting a candidate who was resoundingly defeated during the actual |
| 15 |
election to a Council position because only a handful of people ran for |
| 16 |
the position. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-g2boojum- |
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Grant Goodyear |
| 21 |
Gentoo Developer |
| 22 |
g2boojum@g.o |
| 23 |
http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum |
| 24 |
GPG Fingerprint: D706 9802 1663 DEF5 81B0 9573 A6DC 7152 E0F6 5B76 |
Archives