1 |
On Sun, 30 Dec 2012 11:01:52 -0300 |
2 |
Alexis Ballier <aballier@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> > Etc. ffmpeg is like the holy grail of local bindist descriptions. |
5 |
> |
6 |
> bindist does absolutely nothing by itself there. do you really want a |
7 |
> description like "Enforces license compatibility constraints" ? |
8 |
> I consider this a subset of the current bindist description. If you |
9 |
> don't then maybe the bindist description should be updated. |
10 |
|
11 |
Well, that's another problem we have there. I really like the ffmpeg |
12 |
idea of 'bindist' not doing anything by itself. If all packages did |
13 |
that, I would see no problem with having global meaningful 'bindist'. |
14 |
|
15 |
But if in some cases USE=bindist does something, then I believe ffmpeg |
16 |
should describe that it just 'enforces REQUIRED_USE contraints' with no |
17 |
hidden magic beneath. |
18 |
|
19 |
-- |
20 |
Best regards, |
21 |
Michał Górny |