| 1 |
Markus Ullmann wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Okay, so after figuring out open problems (thanks to kloeri and various |
| 4 |
> other people for help here), we now have a resolution that should |
| 5 |
> satisfy all involved parties here. This should adress dostrow's demands |
| 6 |
> as well. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Nice, I think this is a great improvement. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
> 2. People who contribute good ebuilds over a certain period of time are |
| 11 |
> allowed upon decision by project devs to actively help maintaining the |
| 12 |
> project. They'll be given commit rights for the project then. Same frome |
| 13 |
> above applies here: If we notice any abuse, we revoke access immediately. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Would they be considered Gentoo staff, with everything that involves (quiz, etc)? |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
> 7) tag on bugs |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> All ebuilds that are made available on sunrise get an InOverlay KEYWORDS |
| 20 |
> entry on bugs.g.o so that everyone, who looks at the bug, knows about it. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Would it also be useful to also have a keyword to indicate that the Sunrise |
| 23 |
ebuild has reached the point where it could be migrated to the gentoo repo if a |
| 24 |
maintainer for it steps up? I'm thinking that would make it easy to get a list |
| 25 |
of all m-w ebuilds that are ready for the tree. Maybe a page listing these |
| 26 |
packages would also be a good idea. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
--de. |
Archives