From: | Matt Turner <mattst88@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Cc: | Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Moving more arches to dev profiles | ||
Date: | Wed, 21 Aug 2013 15:32:58 | ||
Message-Id: | CAEdQ38F7g0WTdZ32DwDu8GY46wpJ0i7m5PGmVcdU5Vq=Sr1c4A@mail.gmail.com | ||
In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] Moving more arches to dev profiles by Markos Chandras |
1 | On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 4:04 AM, Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o> wrote: |
2 | > Hi, |
3 | > |
4 | > It's time of year again to consider moving a few arches to dev-only status. |
5 | > |
6 | > I propose the following arches to lose their stable keywords |
7 | > |
8 | > - s390 |
9 | > - sh |
10 | > - ia64 |
11 | > - alpha |
12 | > - m68k |
13 | > - sparc |
14 | |
15 | I want some level between "stable and completely supported" and "loses |
16 | all its stable keywords.", at least for alpha. |
17 | |
18 | Is switching their profiles to dev the way to do that? |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] Moving more arches to dev profiles | Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Moving more arches to dev profiles | Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o> |
[gentoo-dev] Re: Moving more arches to dev profiles | Michael Palimaka <kensington@g.o> |