Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@×××××××.org>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] ACCEPT_LICENSE revisited
Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 22:09:24
Message-Id: 20061118220628.24da125b@snowdrop.home
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] ACCEPT_LICENSE revisited by Mike Doty
1 On Sat, 18 Nov 2006 13:49:12 -0800 Mike Doty <kingtaco@g.o>
2 wrote:
3 | The other option is to submit patches for X and KDE and Gnome to use
4 | a unified license. At least in the X case, it's not that the patches
5 | arn't welcome, it's that the maintainers have things more important
6 | to do than cleaning up after the mess upstream made of the licenses.
7
8 So you're saying that the X maintainers have more important things to
9 do than fixing their ebuilds to follow policy?
10
11 --
12 Ciaran McCreesh
13 Mail : ciaranm at ciaranm.org
14 Web : http://ciaranm.org/
15 as-needed is broken : http://ciaranm.org/show_post.pl?post_id=13

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] ACCEPT_LICENSE revisited Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@g.o>