| 1 |
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sat, 18 Nov 2006 13:49:12 -0800 Mike Doty <kingtaco@g.o> |
| 3 |
> wrote: |
| 4 |
> | The other option is to submit patches for X and KDE and Gnome to use |
| 5 |
> | a unified license. At least in the X case, it's not that the patches |
| 6 |
> | arn't welcome, it's that the maintainers have things more important |
| 7 |
> | to do than cleaning up after the mess upstream made of the licenses. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> So you're saying that the X maintainers have more important things to |
| 10 |
> do than fixing their ebuilds to follow policy? |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
You keep saying it breaks policy but you've never actually cited any |
| 13 |
policy it breaks. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
And yes, I do have better things to do than incredibly boring tasks like |
| 16 |
this. I do Gentoo stuff because it's interesting. If this interests you, |
| 17 |
submit a patch -- it would probably take less time than all the |
| 18 |
complaining you've done about it. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Thanks, |
| 21 |
Donnie |
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives