Archives
Archives
| From: | foser <foser@×××××××××××××××××.net> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] ATTENTION! Broken builds ahead | ||
| Date: | Sat, 22 Nov 2003 23:34:43 | ||
| Message-Id: | 1069544076.26812.16.camel@rivendell | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] ATTENTION! Broken builds ahead by Spider |
||
| 1 | On Sun, 2003-11-23 at 00:06, Spider wrote: |
| 2 | > My super-secret plan is this: |
| 3 | <super-secret plan> |
| 4 | > Ain't It much better? ;) |
| 5 | |
| 6 | No, it's the same idea the other way around. As mentioned earlier : in |
| 7 | most cases it was meant as a transition flag. Transition done ? Make the |
| 8 | stable and maintained UI default. One gtk flag to own them all. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | - foser |
| 11 | |
| 12 | |
| 13 | -- |
| 14 | gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] ATTENTION! Broken builds ahead | Aron Griffis <agriffis@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] ATTENTION! Broken builds ahead | Spider <spider@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] ATTENTION! Broken builds ahead | Paul de Vrieze <pauldv@g.o> |