Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Greg KH <gregkh@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: eudev project announcement
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 21:32:46
Message-Id: 20121217213159.GA9719@kroah.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: eudev project announcement by "J. Roeleveld"
1 On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 09:03:40PM +0100, J. Roeleveld wrote:
2 > Olav Vitters <olav@×××××××.nl> wrote:
3 >
4 > >On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 09:29:26AM -0500, Richard Yao wrote:
5 > >> As I said in an earlier email, Lennart Poettering claims that it does
6 > >> not work. We are discussing some of the things necessary to make it
7 > >work.
8 > >
9 > >Just to repeat:
10 > >In this thread it was claimed that a separate /usr is not supported by
11 > >systemd/udev.
12 > >
13 > >A case which works with latest systemd on various distributions. I
14 > >checked with upstream (not Lennart), and they confirmed it works. I can
15 > >wait for Lennart to say the same, but really not needed.
16 > >
17 > >I assume this will again turn into a "but I meant something else".
18 >
19 > Olav.
20 >
21 > Lennart has stated that he considers a seperate /usr without init* broken.
22
23 Yes, as do I, and so do a lot of other developers.
24
25 But that is a system configuration issue, not a systemd issue, please
26 don't confuse the two.
27
28 > This has worked correctly in the past.
29
30 Define "past" please.
31
32 Note, it's still broken, I have yet to see any upstream fixes to resolve
33 all of the issues that are involved here with "fixing" this up.
34
35 Yes, as always, for some subset of users, you can be lucky and it will
36 work for them, but those systems are getting rarer and rarer these days,
37 as the rest of upstream (not systemd here) are moving on and not doing
38 anything to change their behavior for this topic.
39
40 > The direction udev development is going, according to Lennart, is to
41 > make that impossible and he refuses to fix this regression.
42
43 Again, this has NOTHING to do with udev or systemd, as has been pointed
44 out numerous times. I understand your _wish_ that it would have
45 something to do with it, but that will not change the facts, sorry.
46
47 > I am really happy with this project and intend on testing it once
48 > requests for this appear in the eudev mailing list.
49
50 Good luck, the root problems still remain, and nothing that eudev ever
51 does can resolve that, sorry.
52
53 Can this topic finally be put to rest please? There is a whole web page
54 devoted to this topic, why do people blindly ignore it?
55
56 Again, a separate /usr without an initrd has NOTHING to do with systemd
57 or udev, with the minor exception that Gentoo's packaging of those
58 programs _might_ have an issue, but that is Gentoo's issue, NOT
59 upstream's issue.
60
61 If anyone involved with eudev, or is involved with the Gentoo Council
62 thinks that the previous paragraph is incorrect, they are flat out
63 wrong.
64
65 greg k-h

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: eudev project announcement William Hubbs <williamh@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: eudev project announcement "J. Roeleveld" <joost@××××××××.org>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: eudev project announcement Richard Yao <ryao@g.o>