1 |
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 09:03:40PM +0100, J. Roeleveld wrote: |
2 |
> Olav Vitters <olav@×××××××.nl> wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
> >On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 09:29:26AM -0500, Richard Yao wrote: |
5 |
> >> As I said in an earlier email, Lennart Poettering claims that it does |
6 |
> >> not work. We are discussing some of the things necessary to make it |
7 |
> >work. |
8 |
> > |
9 |
> >Just to repeat: |
10 |
> >In this thread it was claimed that a separate /usr is not supported by |
11 |
> >systemd/udev. |
12 |
> > |
13 |
> >A case which works with latest systemd on various distributions. I |
14 |
> >checked with upstream (not Lennart), and they confirmed it works. I can |
15 |
> >wait for Lennart to say the same, but really not needed. |
16 |
> > |
17 |
> >I assume this will again turn into a "but I meant something else". |
18 |
> |
19 |
> Olav. |
20 |
> |
21 |
> Lennart has stated that he considers a seperate /usr without init* broken. |
22 |
|
23 |
Yes, as do I, and so do a lot of other developers. |
24 |
|
25 |
But that is a system configuration issue, not a systemd issue, please |
26 |
don't confuse the two. |
27 |
|
28 |
> This has worked correctly in the past. |
29 |
|
30 |
Define "past" please. |
31 |
|
32 |
Note, it's still broken, I have yet to see any upstream fixes to resolve |
33 |
all of the issues that are involved here with "fixing" this up. |
34 |
|
35 |
Yes, as always, for some subset of users, you can be lucky and it will |
36 |
work for them, but those systems are getting rarer and rarer these days, |
37 |
as the rest of upstream (not systemd here) are moving on and not doing |
38 |
anything to change their behavior for this topic. |
39 |
|
40 |
> The direction udev development is going, according to Lennart, is to |
41 |
> make that impossible and he refuses to fix this regression. |
42 |
|
43 |
Again, this has NOTHING to do with udev or systemd, as has been pointed |
44 |
out numerous times. I understand your _wish_ that it would have |
45 |
something to do with it, but that will not change the facts, sorry. |
46 |
|
47 |
> I am really happy with this project and intend on testing it once |
48 |
> requests for this appear in the eudev mailing list. |
49 |
|
50 |
Good luck, the root problems still remain, and nothing that eudev ever |
51 |
does can resolve that, sorry. |
52 |
|
53 |
Can this topic finally be put to rest please? There is a whole web page |
54 |
devoted to this topic, why do people blindly ignore it? |
55 |
|
56 |
Again, a separate /usr without an initrd has NOTHING to do with systemd |
57 |
or udev, with the minor exception that Gentoo's packaging of those |
58 |
programs _might_ have an issue, but that is Gentoo's issue, NOT |
59 |
upstream's issue. |
60 |
|
61 |
If anyone involved with eudev, or is involved with the Gentoo Council |
62 |
thinks that the previous paragraph is incorrect, they are flat out |
63 |
wrong. |
64 |
|
65 |
greg k-h |