| 1 |
On Sat, 22 Dec 2007 16:49:10 +0800 |
| 2 |
Zhang Le <r0bertz@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 4 |
> >> As long as there is an agreement in any given point of time, it is |
| 5 |
> >> OK. Such as, put your EAPI definition on the first line of your |
| 6 |
> >> ebuild, like EAPI="value" |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > No good for package managers written before the agreement. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Why not force user to upgrade their PM? |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
That's a) exactly what we're trying to avoid with EAPIs, b) no good |
| 13 |
because there isn't a sane way of forcing a package manager upgrade and |
| 14 |
c) another one of those "wait a year until we can use anything" things. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives