| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
I wholeheartedly agree, we need driers to be separated out, esp. now |
| 5 |
since we are going to be supporting multiple kernel types (obsd, mach, |
| 6 |
linux, etc.) and I second spyderous' suggestion of drivers-${TYPE}. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
- -Dan |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
| 11 |
| On Sun, 2004-07-25 at 11:53, Alastair Tse wrote: |
| 12 |
| |
| 13 |
|>Do we have a sys-drivers or something equivalent? I would argue that |
| 14 |
|>this is needed because the sheer amount of drivers available. We don't |
| 15 |
|>want to start polluting sys-kernels with darwin drivers, do we? |
| 16 |
|> |
| 17 |
|>HOWEVER, I agree that it is premature to setup a category where there |
| 18 |
|>are no plans to even merge these drivers into portage for the next |
| 19 |
|>month or so. |
| 20 |
| |
| 21 |
| |
| 22 |
| I've been talking about something like this for a while. My idea, |
| 23 |
| however, is more like drivers-${TYPE}, where TYPE is video, net or |
| 24 |
| whatever else. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 27 |
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) |
| 28 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
iD8DBQFBBEtLsb0gXCN8LgURAu9gAKCE/DEwK+PFIEpqfEG0qDSe7qat8ACg6sgJ |
| 31 |
SUyzjskG0bgbLH+BZfEBlZk= |
| 32 |
=MpPD |
| 33 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
-- |
| 36 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives