1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA256 |
3 |
|
4 |
On 31/10/12 11:26 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote: |
5 |
> On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 18:39:44 -0600 Ryan Hill |
6 |
> <dirtyepic@g.o> wrote: [...] |
7 |
>>> The file is pointless if not everyone is using it. I've |
8 |
>>> offered to remove the file before, and I'm reoffering to do so |
9 |
>>> now. |
10 |
>> |
11 |
>> It's pointy enough for most uses. Let's keep it that way. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> I would like to know what are those uses. Here are my thoughts |
14 |
> about changelogs: |
15 |
> |
16 |
> We have cvs logs, cvsweb, etc. So what is the value added from |
17 |
> changelogs? Well, those logs are per-file as far as I know, and |
18 |
> since a new version of a package means a new .ebuild file, keeping |
19 |
> track of changes to packages is painful without a changelog which |
20 |
> is global to the whole package. Even if we have all the needed |
21 |
> information in the cvs log, changelogs for packages are definitely |
22 |
> useful. Now for eclasses the situation is different: I want to |
23 |
> know what has recently changed in foo.eclass, what is the fastest |
24 |
> way? Search through a changelog file with dozens of absolutely |
25 |
> unrelated information, or run cvs log/go to sources.gentoo.org ? I |
26 |
> tend to do the latter and find eclass changelogs completely |
27 |
> useless. |
28 |
> |
29 |
|
30 |
Cool, you do, that's great. This doesn't mean others don't use a |
31 |
different process tho, and since it *IS* there and is *SUPPOSED* to be |
32 |
filled, and it really doesn't hurt to run 'echangelog "${msg}" && cvs |
33 |
ci -m "${msg}"' , why not do it? |
34 |
|
35 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
36 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) |
37 |
|
38 |
iF4EAREIAAYFAlCRRU0ACgkQ2ugaI38ACPCobwD+LZvXFPyfsGZ+484wnkv6fk8L |
39 |
oBazGyjti3n2nNAkM8IA/A5IvVNyOnd6U9lVH1B2dRA2HB1+i8Hac1aAKvs/EPF1 |
40 |
=F5eR |
41 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |