| 1 |
On Mon, 01 Jun 2009 23:01:04 +0200 |
| 2 |
Mounir Lamouri <volkmar@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> > The main show-stopper for this last time it came up was all those X |
| 4 |
> > packages using their package name as a licence. Have you thought of |
| 5 |
> > how to get that glaring QA issue addressed? |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> That's a very bad issue I never heard about before. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> I see no other options. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> If anyone has an idea or suggestion... |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Honestly, I suggest you find some poor sucker to do what the xorg team |
| 14 |
should have done two years ago. It's a fair bit of work to fix all the |
| 15 |
licences, but it's the best long term solution. Perhaps you could ask |
| 16 |
the Council to see if they could nominate it as a special priority |
| 17 |
project and encourage every developer to fix one package. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Archives