From: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@×××××××××××××.uk> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: [GLEP] Use EAPI-suffixed ebuilds (.ebuild-EAPI) [2] | ||
Date: | Thu, 27 Dec 2007 16:53:54 | ||
Message-Id: | 20071227165059.3640d4e6@blueyonder.co.uk | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: [GLEP] Use EAPI-suffixed ebuilds (.ebuild-EAPI) [2] by Roy Marples |
1 | On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 16:45:06 +0000 |
2 | Roy Marples <roy@×××××××.name> wrote: |
3 | > > Alright, so where would you stick EAPI such that all the |
4 | > > requirements that've previously been described are met? |
5 | > |
6 | > I neither know, nor care. |
7 | > |
8 | > I just feel very strongly that the current proposal is wrong, and no |
9 | > requirements that you or others may have can possibly outweigh that. |
10 | |
11 | So you have no technical objections, no alternatives, no understanding |
12 | of why it's necessary and no actual reason to call it 'wrong'. |
13 | |
14 | -- |
15 | Ciaran McCreesh |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: [GLEP] Use EAPI-suffixed ebuilds (.ebuild-EAPI) [2] | Roy Marples <roy@×××××××.name> |