Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@×××××××××××××.uk>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: [GLEP] Use EAPI-suffixed ebuilds (.ebuild-EAPI) [2]
Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2007 16:53:54
Message-Id: 20071227165059.3640d4e6@blueyonder.co.uk
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: [GLEP] Use EAPI-suffixed ebuilds (.ebuild-EAPI) [2] by Roy Marples
1 On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 16:45:06 +0000
2 Roy Marples <roy@×××××××.name> wrote:
3 > > Alright, so where would you stick EAPI such that all the
4 > > requirements that've previously been described are met?
5 >
6 > I neither know, nor care.
7 >
8 > I just feel very strongly that the current proposal is wrong, and no
9 > requirements that you or others may have can possibly outweigh that.
10
11 So you have no technical objections, no alternatives, no understanding
12 of why it's necessary and no actual reason to call it 'wrong'.
13
14 --
15 Ciaran McCreesh

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: [GLEP] Use EAPI-suffixed ebuilds (.ebuild-EAPI) [2] Roy Marples <roy@×××××××.name>