| 1 |
On 11/6/20 9:21 AM, Agostino Sarubbo wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hello all, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> 6 months have been passed after the CI system started to file bug reports. |
| 5 |
> ~ 4700 bugs have been submitted |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> We _know_ that atm is not possible to set a specific summary, instead a |
| 8 |
> generic summary is used in case of compile failures and test failures. |
| 9 |
> There are also some documented limitations. |
| 10 |
Would it be possible for "someone" to figure it out, if you made your |
| 11 |
tinderbox scripts/code public? ;) Hate to say it, but toralf does pretty |
| 12 |
good job here, so it could be better. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
> Since there are conflicting opinions I would like to know if you find it |
| 15 |
> useful or not. |
| 16 |
Yes, I do find your tinderbox work useful most of the time. Thanks! |
| 17 |
However the latest, ehh, show with DISTUTILS_USE_SETUPTOOLS has made |
| 18 |
people do *hundreds* of commits that now apparently need a fixing |
| 19 |
anyway, or reverting back, and that doesn't feel nice. Sure maybe the |
| 20 |
eclass could do some fixing too, but maybe this notice wasn't meant to |
| 21 |
be full-tree scanned (at least _yet_). |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
From my point of view your work is, and has been, appreciated, but you |
| 24 |
could coordinate better with other people. Hate to say it again, but |
| 25 |
toralf does seems to do a better job here too in that regard. Unless |
| 26 |
you're fine with comparing tinderboxers. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
With toralf's logs it's easy to reproduce the whole environment leading |
| 29 |
to a build failure, while with yours it's just build.log, thay may or |
| 30 |
may not be enough to find the build-breaking issue. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
-- juippis |
Archives