| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
2007-07-19 18:52:59 Chris Gianelloni napisał(a): |
| 5 |
> On Thu, 2007-07-19 at 12:19 +0200, Jakub Moc wrote: |
| 6 |
> > Petteri Räty napsal(a): |
| 7 |
> > > Or just do it via package.use in profiles until IUSE defaults are |
| 8 |
> > > implemented. |
| 9 |
> > > |
| 10 |
> > > Regards, |
| 11 |
> > > Petteri |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> > As noted before, they are implemented, just not allowed in the tree. |
| 14 |
> > Plus, what vapier said, this info belongs to the ebuilds, not to |
| 15 |
> > profiles. |
| 16 |
> > |
| 17 |
> > Wrt pidgin - seriously, what's the big issue here? Users can't use |
| 18 |
> > emerge -pv output and determine what they want, or? Will we bloat the |
| 19 |
> > profiles everytime someone forgets to enable a flag and goes complain |
| 20 |
> > upstream about a 'missing' feature? |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> Unfortunately, that is the state we're currently in with regards to our |
| 23 |
> profiles and the tree. I know I would *love* to see us start using IUSE |
| 24 |
> defaults as soon as possible in the tree. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
So just start using IUSE defaults! There's no problem with doing it at once |
| 27 |
since it can be considered as a part of EAPI=0. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
- -- |
| 30 |
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis |
| 31 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 32 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.5 (GNU/Linux) |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
iD8DBQFGn5rN/axNJ4Xo/ZERAkQkAJ9W0+c4+sSVNWTIgZQsavHMQsbKvgCfTdVq |
| 35 |
F2sZo6zkymYT4/A30k/c/Wg= |
| 36 |
=VZZf |
| 37 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 38 |
-- |
| 39 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives