| 1 |
On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 15:28 -0500, Grant Goodyear wrote: |
| 2 |
> One of the consequences of the management restructuring is that at some |
| 3 |
> point stuff in gentoo/xml/htdocs/proj/en will probably move around. Of |
| 4 |
> course, doing that in CVS is a royal pain. I'd love to see our gentoo |
| 5 |
> tree migrate over to svn (not the portage tree, just gentoo!), but of |
| 6 |
> course you folks are the major users of that tree. Has this been |
| 7 |
> considered? This tree is still fairly large, so it might not yet be |
| 8 |
> feasible w/ svn, but I don't know if anybody has tried. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
The tree is ~250MB at this time. Both genkernel and catalyst are under |
| 11 |
this tree, and I'm sure that we don't want to move either of these any |
| 12 |
time soon. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
-- |
| 15 |
Chris Gianelloni |
| 16 |
Release Engineering - Strategic Lead/QA Manager |
| 17 |
Games - Developer |
| 18 |
Gentoo Linux |
Archives