Gentoo Archives: gentoo-doc

From: Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@g.o>
To: gentoo-doc@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-doc] svn vs cvs
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 21:08:04
Message-Id: 1126818365.23324.76.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net
In Reply to: [gentoo-doc] svn vs cvs by Grant Goodyear
On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 15:28 -0500, Grant Goodyear wrote:
> One of the consequences of the management restructuring is that at some > point stuff in gentoo/xml/htdocs/proj/en will probably move around. Of > course, doing that in CVS is a royal pain. I'd love to see our gentoo > tree migrate over to svn (not the portage tree, just gentoo!), but of > course you folks are the major users of that tree. Has this been > considered? This tree is still fairly large, so it might not yet be > feasible w/ svn, but I don't know if anybody has tried.
The tree is ~250MB at this time. Both genkernel and catalyst are under this tree, and I'm sure that we don't want to move either of these any time soon. -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead/QA Manager Games - Developer Gentoo Linux

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-doc] svn vs cvs Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>