1 |
On Tuesday 13 May 2008, Ed W wrote: |
2 |
> Mike Frysinger wrote: |
3 |
> > On Thursday 08 May 2008, Joe Lacombe wrote: |
4 |
> >> <FONT face="Default Sans Serif,Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif" |
5 |
> >> size=2> |
6 |
> > |
7 |
> > i left my HTML eyeballs at home. please fix your e-mail client. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> You appear to be using KMail which supports html mail just fine... |
10 |
|
11 |
which ive disabled so i dont have to deal with it. replies/quoting easily |
12 |
break and destroy followups. all so people can force their preferred viewing |
13 |
font on others. |
14 |
|
15 |
> (For reference I run an ISP serving customers over a 2,400 baud |
16 |
> satellite link which costs significant $$ per min - if anyone should |
17 |
> care about compact email I would be up there - however, I do think this |
18 |
> reluctance to accept HTML email is pretty old fashioned these days.... |
19 |
> OK, Next up, banning websites which don't work perfectly in links...) |
20 |
|
21 |
if you want to make the argument on a non-technical list, go for it. open |
22 |
source technical lists (such as this one) have all banned html. get with it |
23 |
or dont post. |
24 |
-mike |