| 1 |
On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 08:55 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tuesday 13 May 2008, Ed W wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > On Thursday 08 May 2008, Joe Lacombe wrote: |
| 5 |
> > >> <FONT face="Default Sans Serif,Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif" |
| 6 |
> > >> size=2> |
| 7 |
> > > |
| 8 |
> > > i left my HTML eyeballs at home. please fix your e-mail client. |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > You appear to be using KMail which supports html mail just fine... |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> which ive disabled so i dont have to deal with it. replies/quoting easily |
| 13 |
> break and destroy followups. all so people can force their preferred viewing |
| 14 |
> font on others. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> > (For reference I run an ISP serving customers over a 2,400 baud |
| 17 |
> > satellite link which costs significant $$ per min - if anyone should |
| 18 |
> > care about compact email I would be up there - however, I do think this |
| 19 |
> > reluctance to accept HTML email is pretty old fashioned these days.... |
| 20 |
> > OK, Next up, banning websites which don't work perfectly in links...) |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> if you want to make the argument on a non-technical list, go for it. open |
| 23 |
> source technical lists (such as this one) have all banned html. get with it |
| 24 |
> or dont post. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
When Robin returns from Hong Kong etc.. We should see what we can do |
| 27 |
about having our mailing lists outright reject posts that are text/html. |
| 28 |
It messes up archives and the likes. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
gentoo-embedded@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives