| 1 |
Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> wrote on 2010/09/24 19:01:26: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> On Friday, September 24, 2010 12:01:21 Joakim Tjernlund wrote: |
| 4 |
> > - make crossdev respect PORTAGE_CONFIGROOT. We use our own portage |
| 5 |
> > tree for our pkgs, including the compiler, as we want to be able |
| 6 |
> > to recreate/rebuild the same sw versions in the future. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> i dont know what this means. crossdev doesnt touch PORTAGE_CONFIGROOT at all. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Exactly, it uses hardcoded paths to /etc et. all instead of PORTAGE_CONFIGROOT/etc |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> > - a switch to control softfloat instead of encoding this in vendor |
| 14 |
> > name. The cross name is getting too long with softfloat in it. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> except that softfloat checks go beyond the cross-compiler and packages in the |
| 17 |
> tree need to be able to query support. unless you have a clean way of |
| 18 |
> handling this, there is no alternative. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
packages in the tree? I figured that only gcc and glibc(possibly binutils too) |
| 21 |
needed that info? |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
I just tried to use EXTRA_ECONF=--without-fp instead of softfloat |
| 24 |
and it seems to have worked, at least gcc and glibc builds without FPU insn's |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
hmm, wonder if COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS could be used to see if softfloat is on? |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> > - make crossdev build a binary cross compiler pkg which can be |
| 30 |
> > emerged by other machines. |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> crossdev is merely a frontend to emerge. so do it yourself: |
| 33 |
> crossdev ... --portage -B ... |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
That works? Guess I have to try it then :) |
| 36 |
However, the sauna is waiting for me ATM so it will have to wait .. |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
Jocke |
Archives