| 1 |
On 12/19/14 10:53, Karl-Johan Karlsson wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Fri 19 Dec 2014 18.00.16 James Taylor wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On 2014/12/19 17:08, Karl-Johan Karlsson wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> Unfortunately, the machine is in production, and since it works without |
| 5 |
>>> that option when using the ext4 code to read ext3, I would prefer to |
| 6 |
>>> leave it alone for now. |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>> Would mount -oremount,user_xattr be an option? Or am I missing the point :) |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> The point you are missing is that, as I wrote upthread, I rebooted a week ago |
| 11 |
> to a kernel that runs ext3 mounts through the ext4 code, which does not |
| 12 |
> require this mount option. So since it's now working, and this is a rather |
| 13 |
> critical machine, I'd rather not reboot it again just to check. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Can you please test paxmark.sh from commit 84ca1170 and let me know. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Thanks for the report but if its not too much of a bother, can you open |
| 19 |
a bug at bugs.gentoo.org next time because it makes it so much easier to |
| 20 |
properly track bugs that way. You can always discuss bugs on the list |
| 21 |
(or anywhere you can catch me like IRC) but having the report in |
| 22 |
bugs.g.o leave behind a historical memory of what we did. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
Anthony G. Basile, Ph. D. |
| 26 |
Chair of Information Technology |
| 27 |
D'Youville College |
| 28 |
Buffalo, NY 14201 |
| 29 |
(716) 829-8197 |
Archives