Archives
Archives
| From: | Sven Vermeulen <sven.vermeulen@××××××.be> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-hardened@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-hardened] SELinux policy for nginx, or include in apache? | ||
| Date: | Sun, 19 Jun 2011 15:24:35 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20110619151944.GB4651@siphos.be | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-hardened] SELinux policy for nginx, or include in apache? by Chris Richards |
||
| 1 | On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 10:15:14PM -0500, Chris Richards wrote: |
| 2 | > I'm torn on this, but basically I think we ought to track upstream here. |
| 3 | |
| 4 | Which is... ? ;-) |
| 5 | |
| 6 | As I said, there's no clear consensus from within upstream. |
| 7 | |
| 8 | But I notice most people aim for a specific nginx module, so that's what |
| 9 | we'll go to. I'll make the necessary preparations for it. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | Wkr, |
| 12 | Sven Vermeulen |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-hardened] SELinux policy for nginx, or include in apache? | Chris Richards <gizmo@×××××××××.com> |
| Re: [gentoo-hardened] SELinux policy for nginx, or include in apache? | Chris Richards <gizmo@×××××××××.com> |