1 |
Great response... thanks for taking the time -- I was about to do so |
2 |
myself. |
3 |
|
4 |
On Sat, 2006-09-09 at 08:49 -0700, David Herron wrote: |
5 |
> Actually we are offering Sun's JDK under a free license that allows |
6 |
> any Solaris or Linux distribution to redistribute the binary. I've |
7 |
> been working with Joshua and Karl to help/advise them on integrating |
8 |
> Sun's JDK with Gentoo under that new license. |
9 |
|
10 |
Thanks for assisting the Gentoo distro (and therefore all of us) in this |
11 |
way. |
12 |
|
13 |
|
14 |
> I just read the email thread you're responding |
15 |
> to, and it was a painful walk down memory lane. ... |
16 |
> Hopefully between the DLJ license and the imminent |
17 |
> beginning for open source Java, that we can put all the past pain |
18 |
> behind us. |
19 |
|
20 |
I hope *strongly* for the same. I observe a huge amount of |
21 |
idealogical-based dislike of the Java platform/language in the Open |
22 |
Source world. IMO, the overarching reason for this is due to current |
23 |
licensing issues. Without commenting on the merits of that view, I |
24 |
eagerly hope for the day I can have a straight-forward, unencumbered |
25 |
technical discussion with such folks on the massive value of Java. At |
26 |
least then our technical flame-wars can be based on the appropriate |
27 |
topic. ;-) |
28 |
|
29 |
Here's to the future. I hope Sun walks openly and properly into this |
30 |
new era (chooses a good OSI license, etc.) within the next month or two. |
31 |
If so, IMHO, Java will become a dominating force across the Open Source |
32 |
world as it has in other walks of life. |
33 |
|
34 |
~ Greg |