| 1 |
On 05/05/2014 06:22 PM, Matt Turner wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 7:06 AM, Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Hi all, |
| 4 |
>> |
| 5 |
>> Right now the number of stages for each endianness is 8: |
| 6 |
>>[...] |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Do we need r1 and r2 stages? |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Why not? r2 has been around ~10 years. But r1 devices are still present. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
>> |
| 14 |
>> ==> 16 stages in total. |
| 15 |
>> |
| 16 |
>> This takes quite a bit of time for all stages to be built (by the time |
| 17 |
>> everything is built, we are one month passed the time the snapshot was |
| 18 |
>> taken). How about stop building stages for mips1, mips3 and mips4? |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> How often are you building stages? |
| 21 |
Roughly every 3 months. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> Resources aren't a problem but it takes a month to build everything? |
| 25 |
Well, my free time is also limited so it's not just the resources that |
| 26 |
may or may not cause some problem :) Preparing catalyst and solving |
| 27 |
blockers in ~arch takes a considerable amount of my Gentoo time. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
> Don't you have a 16 or 32-core build system? Cavium gave me ssh access |
| 30 |
> to one that I was planning to build stages on, but I never tried. |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> I guess I don't understand the problem you're facing. |
| 33 |
> |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
My question (and not a problem) is whether building stages for old ISAs |
| 36 |
is desired or not. If it is, then that's fine. If not, then maybe we can |
| 37 |
stop building stages or maybe we can build them once a year? Like you |
| 38 |
said, with the additions of newer ISAs (like -r3) the total number of |
| 39 |
stages will grow even more. I think we are the arch with the most stages |
| 40 |
in Gentoo, which is a great thing(!) but maybe we can reconsider our |
| 41 |
options, and make room for newer ISAs and variants? |
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
-- |
| 44 |
Regards, |
| 45 |
Markos Chandras |
Archives