Gentoo Archives: gentoo-nfp

From: Ned Ludd <solar@g.o>
To: "William L. Thomson Jr." <wltjr@g.o>
Cc: gentoo-nfp <gentoo-nfp@l.g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-nfp] RE: [gentoo-council] Foundation by laws: new Article V
Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2008 16:49:23
Message-Id: 1220374159.13969.12.camel@media
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-nfp] RE: [gentoo-council] Foundation by laws: new Article V by "William L. Thomson Jr."
1 On Tue, 2008-09-02 at 11:35 -0400, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
2 > On Tue, 2008-09-02 at 08:25 -0700, Ned Ludd wrote:
3 > > On Tue, 2008-09-02 at 15:06 +0000, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
4 > >
5 > > [snip]
6 > >
7 > > > I understand the reasons you and others have
8 > > > raised, but in my view this should be left to the voters - it is (or
9 > > > should be) their choice in the end.
10 > >
11 > > I tend to agree with this statement.
12 >
13 > I guess everyone forgets my calls for that a long time ago. Much less
14 > that I was trying to go through the bylaws section by section. So all
15 > could feel they were involved and had some say.
16 >
17 > I am so sick of all this crap. Which explains why I resigned.
18 >
19 > Now we have someone from infra and elections commenting on voting.
20
21 I'm sorry. Are you trying to call me out? Pretty sure I'm a foundation
22 member longer than most anybody here. Do I not have a voice in Gentoo
23 after putting it 5+ years of my life towards it?
24
25 If you are sick of stuff. Stop commenting. I was not replying to you to
26 begin with.

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-nfp] RE: [gentoo-council] Foundation by laws: new Article V "William L. Thomson Jr." <wltjr@g.o>