Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2014-04-08
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 16:06:24
Message-Id: 53399137.8070907@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2014-04-08 by Rich Freeman
1 On 30/03/14 04:35, Rich Freeman wrote:
2 > On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 8:37 PM, William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> wrote:
3 >> Some how we need to focus on getting people to respect each other and
4 >> the policies we already have, and quite frankly, if they won't do that,
5 >> removing them from the community.
6 > Alas, we cannot afford to drive people away any more than we can
7 > afford to let them drive others away...
8 >
9 > I really wish that devs would get over their differences and just talk
10 > about their ideas. You don't need anybody's "permission" to do many
11 > things around here. That doesn't mean that it isn't nice (and more
12 > importantly wise) to at least ask for some feedback before striking
13 > off on your own.
14
15 The problem here is that 'to at least ask for some feedback' seems to
16 mean 'it must
17 be discussed on the gentoo-dev ML' for some people, even if the feedback
18 required
19 has already been given elsewhere by good number of developers (like IRC)
20
21 - Samuli

Replies