Archives
Archives
| From: | Ralph Sennhauser <sera@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-project@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2014-03-11 | ||
| Date: | Tue, 04 Mar 2014 13:16:24 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20140304141611.1e47fdf5@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2014-03-11 by Rich Freeman |
||
| 1 | On Tue, 4 Mar 2014 06:12:06 -0500 |
| 2 | Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 | |
| 4 | > Some EAPI changes are easier than others. This one was only from |
| 5 | > non-banned to banned because we haven't gotten around to banning EAPI |
| 6 | > 0 yet. I'm all for doing that for non-toolchain ebuilds until we |
| 7 | > figure out what to do with the toolchain. |
| 8 | |
| 9 | What toolchain is allowed to do the rest of the tree is as well. |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2014-03-11 | Patrick Lauer <patrick@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2014-03-11 | Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> |