| 1 |
On Wed, 19 Jun 2013 13:49:24 -0500 |
| 2 |
William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 01:59:03PM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 5 |
> > On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 1:35 PM, Markos Chandras |
| 6 |
> > <hwoarang@g.o> wrote: |
| 7 |
> > > For me, this problem is critical. Devrel is working on |
| 8 |
> > > formalizing a new policy, and we will announce news on this soon. |
| 9 |
> > > In the meantime, to prevent further escalations, I will use my |
| 10 |
> > > lead powers to request immediate bans whenever I see one of you |
| 11 |
> > > violate the CoC[2] and ignore the previous warnings. |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> > Perhaps a bit of a sledgehammer approach, but right now I think it |
| 14 |
> > is safe to say that we're leaning far too on the side of leniency. |
| 15 |
> > I look forward to the new policy proposals. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> Markos, I want to also publically say thanks for handling this. The |
| 18 |
> bullying/trolling/etc has been going on for far too long. Yes, it may |
| 19 |
> be a sledgehammer approach, but there are times when the big |
| 20 |
> sledgehammer is needed, and imo this is one of those times. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
+1; for cases that aren't worthy of a sledgehammer, I hope there will |
| 23 |
be short templated warnings to put the developers back on track. Good |
| 24 |
to see Developer Relations stepping up; there has been a bit too much |
| 25 |
noise on the mailing list lately, most of those took a considerable |
| 26 |
amount of time that could have been invested on more useful matters. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
With kind regards, |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
Tom Wijsman (TomWij) |
| 32 |
Gentoo Developer |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
E-mail address : TomWij@g.o |
| 35 |
GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D |
| 36 |
GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D |
Archives