1 |
On Sat, 15 Jun 2013 00:59:15 +0430 |
2 |
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn <chithanh@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> So users and other developers can choose what they like more. |
5 |
|
6 |
I don't think they will like half of the files being in the package X |
7 |
and the other half being in a different package X-systemd and yet |
8 |
another half being stuffed in a collective package systemd-units. |
9 |
|
10 |
Oh, and not to forget about X-openrc, X-cron, X-..., ... and so on. |
11 |
|
12 |
Putting the maintenance burden on users is the worst thing we can do. |
13 |
|
14 |
> I believe QA has no authority to (functionally) change packages, |
15 |
> although they can p.mask whatever they consider unacceptable. |
16 |
|
17 |
Define "unacceptable", maybe they'll mask the X-whatever packages in the |
18 |
future because it has turned into a mess; such a mess we can't easily |
19 |
migrate away from, because we first have to start another 5 threads... |
20 |
|
21 |
> Besides, I do not think that it makes sense here to distinguish |
22 |
> between individual developers maintaining individual packages, herds |
23 |
> (package maintenance groups) and projects. |
24 |
|
25 |
They were probably just examples; I don't advocate the idea he |
26 |
explained there, but I'm against all the alternatives that are being |
27 |
suggested. They might make sense from a "making maintainers happy" |
28 |
perspective, but in practice it just damages the user experience. |
29 |
|
30 |
> This is something I fundamentally do not agree with. Gentoo is not a |
31 |
> team that works together. |
32 |
|
33 |
It's not like in a sports game, but we are people working together; we |
34 |
may not pursue the same thing, but we should pursue what is best for |
35 |
our users. Whatever way you go, the users will end up experiencing it. |
36 |
|
37 |
> There is no set direction (or "stream"). |
38 |
|
39 |
Then why do we have an about page documenting one? There is. |
40 |
|
41 |
> Gentoo is a collection of individuals which each work on a small part |
42 |
> of it, and the interference in that is kept to the necessary minimum, |
43 |
> mostly by Council enacted rules. I would be very unhappy if that were |
44 |
> to change. |
45 |
|
46 |
You can't avoid interference, it is bound to happen sooner or later; |
47 |
when it does, Council shouldn't be implied, but rather be the exception. |
48 |
|
49 |
I would be very unhappy if Gentoo only ran on rules and silence; |
50 |
these not only affect our developers, but even more also our users. |
51 |
|
52 |
-- |
53 |
With kind regards, |
54 |
|
55 |
Tom Wijsman (TomWij) |
56 |
Gentoo Developer |
57 |
|
58 |
E-mail address : TomWij@g.o |
59 |
GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D |
60 |
GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D |