Gentoo Archives: gentoo-qa

From: "Diego Elio Pettenò" <flameeyes@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-qa@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-qa] QA power to suspend access [WAS: Re: Roll-call for the team members and requesting a new election]
Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 20:04:13
Message-Id: 1283540790.2293.51.camel@saladin.local
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-qa] QA power to suspend access [WAS: Re: Roll-call for the team members and requesting a new election] by "Petteri Räty"
Il giorno ven, 03/09/2010 alle 19.43 +0300, Petteri Räty ha scritto:
> > It doesn't require infra as DevRel has the needed powers to shut down > access. DevRel is needed any way to process the retirement. I think > infra should only be the fallback if DevRel people with needed access > are not available fast enough.
If you couldn't notice, we're explicitly trying to get this done without DevRel intervention at first. Right now we have something along these lines: QA team member finds the screwup → reports to QA lead → ask nicely the devrel read → devrel can sit thinking about it. In the mean time, the person who was originally caught can keep committing, eventually bringing up a problem worse than the previous one, and so on so forth. What _I_ would like to see for QA? (and think others would agree) QA team member finds the screwup → track down another one that agrees on the problem being big enough → they ask infra to suspend access → devrel can either negotiate for the reinstatement or proceed with retirement. -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes http://blog.flameeyes.eu/

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies