| 1 |
Eduardo Tongson wrote: |
| 2 |
>>>Well, the problem right now is what kind of a route do we want to take? |
| 3 |
>>>For example, if Gentoo wanted to try and maintain an enterprise ready |
| 4 |
>>>solution to the stable tree issue, I don't think we could do it. On the |
| 5 |
>>>other hand, if we wanted to establish a few tools/solutions that provide |
| 6 |
>>>some enterprise ready functionality, I think we may be able to do that. |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>>Unfortunately I think you're right. While I would like to contribute to the |
| 9 |
>>maintainance of a stable Portage tree, it is definately beyond what a handful |
| 10 |
>>of devs can accomplish in the long run. |
| 11 |
>> |
| 12 |
>>New docs on the other hand should be a better priority to start out with. |
| 13 |
>> |
| 14 |
>> |
| 15 |
>>>Anyways, I'd love to hear your feedback and opinions! |
| 16 |
>> |
| 17 |
>>And I'd love to help with the docs:-) |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> Good to see it's gaining momentum again. Volunteers can probably help |
| 21 |
> in some way if devs let them know what specifically needs helping. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
I looked around a bit and saw we have a sysadmin page [1] talking about |
| 24 |
various sysadmin type things. At this point I'm wanting to ask you as |
| 25 |
fellow gentoo server admins, what do *you* want to see on the main |
| 26 |
Gentoo server site? What is missing now that we need to fill in the |
| 27 |
gaps? Any specific documentation we should cover? What goals/projects |
| 28 |
should we look at developing? Do any of you already have some tools |
| 29 |
developed that maybe we could host/help with? |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
[1] http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/index.xml?catid=sysadmin |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
-- |
| 34 |
Lance Albertson <ramereth@g.o> |
| 35 |
Gentoo Infrastructure | Operations Manager |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
--- |
| 38 |
GPG Public Key: <http://www.ramereth.net/lance.asc> |
| 39 |
Key fingerprint: 0423 92F3 544A 1282 5AB1 4D07 416F A15D 27F4 B742 |
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
ramereth/irc.freenode.net |
Archives