1 |
Hi Mișu, |
2 |
|
3 |
I can't see the point of using any of OpenSource Alternatives since all of them have a commercial version to support all features such as the MAPI Connector and AppleMail. |
4 |
|
5 |
I'm missing something? If I'm wrong, those services will be a viable solution. |
6 |
|
7 |
Thanks for the tip. |
8 |
|
9 |
Sent from my iPhone |
10 |
|
11 |
On 29/10/2011, at 17:21, Mișu Moldovan <dumol@×××××.org> wrote: |
12 |
|
13 |
> 2011/10/29 Vinícius Ferrão <viniciusferrao@××××××××××.br>: |
14 |
> [snip] |
15 |
>> PS: We already have MS Licenses, since I'm in a university with MSDNAA program. |
16 |
> |
17 |
> I've worked in environments with MS Exchange as an internal mail |
18 |
> server, using qmail and others as relays, for extra security. The MS |
19 |
> server required specialized expertise and compatible clients, MAPI |
20 |
> being strongly preferred by Exchange. This has been a PITA for users |
21 |
> with free software operating systems. As a last resort, there is an |
22 |
> IMAP connector in MS Exchange, but this software functions poorly as |
23 |
> an IMAP server. |
24 |
> |
25 |
> I would suggest a free-software mail server, with support for MAPI, |
26 |
> Active Sync and the likes, it there really is a need for it (consider |
27 |
> IMAP with idle support and open alternatives for synchronization of |
28 |
> PIM data). Look for the likes of Open-Xchange, SoGo, Zarafa, Zimbra |
29 |
> for full Exchange compatibility. |
30 |
> |
31 |
> HTH, |
32 |
> |
33 |
> -- |
34 |
> mișu |
35 |
> |