| 1 |
Aiko, |
| 2 |
Much apologies on the missing qmail.schema missing, I made a diff and |
| 3 |
worked on it a month ago but got caught up on other projects. If you |
| 4 |
didn't notice it didn't copy the control files to the right directory. |
| 5 |
My aim is for openldap 2.0.xx series, can you let me know if that patch |
| 6 |
is backwards compatible? I also see that you enabled tls by default |
| 7 |
which should be the choice of the user by setting the ssl flag in |
| 8 |
make.conf. As for openldap 2.1.x series, it's been stable for months |
| 9 |
it's just that we have problems with other programs using berkdb-4 and |
| 10 |
we're not about to upgrade that. Berkdb-4 is a dependancy for openldap |
| 11 |
2.1 to work, after the latest patch I made gets applied to the tree, we |
| 12 |
can work on moving it to stable and then make another ebuild for |
| 13 |
openldap 2.1 and deem it unstable. My tester has said it worked |
| 14 |
perfectly fine with the patch I gave him so moving it to stable seems |
| 15 |
like a good idea. |
| 16 |
I also have plans to release a qmail-ldap document sometime in the |
| 17 |
future so everyone can take the fruits of the running qmail with ldap. I |
| 18 |
wrote the ldap document currently on gentoo.org and I feel like I'm |
| 19 |
going to have to upgrade that as well with the upgrade of openldap 2.1. |
| 20 |
Email me directly if you want to help out and we'll talk more. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Thanks, |
| 23 |
Benjamin Coles |
| 24 |
Gentoo Infrastructure |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
On Wed, 2003-12-31 at 05:07, Aiko Barz wrote: |
| 27 |
> On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 11:29:13PM -0800, Benjamin Coles wrote: |
| 28 |
> > Hi there Aiko, |
| 29 |
> > There already is a qmail-ldap in the portage that has SMTPAUTH and |
| 30 |
> > TLS... There are a number of fixes that I need to apply to it, I'll try |
| 31 |
> > getting it done by next week. To use the TLS in the ebuild you need an |
| 32 |
> > extra TLS in your make.conf use flags, I know this is out of standard |
| 33 |
> > but not everyone uses this but building with ssl usually gave tls in the |
| 34 |
> > past. Maybe you can make comments on my ebuild after I update the |
| 35 |
> > mishaps in the first one. |
| 36 |
> |
| 37 |
> I also updated the first ebuild in #28203 to get ezmlm support and to |
| 38 |
> get the qmail.schema copied into /etc/openldap/schema. |
| 39 |
> This worked fine for nearly 5 month, i guess. |
| 40 |
> (btw: It's stable stable stable) |
| 41 |
> |
| 42 |
> But the qmail.schema in qmail-ldap-1.03-r1.ebuild will never work with |
| 43 |
> openldap-2.1.XX. To get this done out of the box, you need the new |
| 44 |
> patch from André Oppermann. |
| 45 |
> Then you will realise, that this patch already contains smtp-auth and |
| 46 |
> TLS. |
| 47 |
> Have a look at those features |
| 48 |
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/attachment.cgi?id=22859&action=view. |
| 49 |
> (btw.: This ebuild is also based on the first ebuild. Make a diff!) |
| 50 |
> |
| 51 |
> That ebuild is working at my box right now. The smtp-auth and TLS |
| 52 |
> stuff is working perfectly. The ezmlm-Mainlinglist is doing its job... |
| 53 |
> |
| 54 |
> Openldap-2.0.27-r4 seems to be stable, but after a month uptime there |
| 55 |
> are far to many ESTABLISHED connections. But i donnow. Since there are |
| 56 |
> quite some differences between 2.0 and 2.1 i will stay with |
| 57 |
> openldap-2.1. |
| 58 |
> If gentoo switches to openldap-2.1.XX in the stable tree the openldap |
| 59 |
> users won't be able to restart their openldap-servers. One reason is |
| 60 |
> the broken qmail.schema. So qmail-ldap must be also ready for this |
| 61 |
> moment. |
| 62 |
> |
| 63 |
> Bis denne, |
| 64 |
> Aiko |
Archives