1 |
Hi! |
2 |
|
3 |
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 11:00:21AM +0100, Ian P. Christian wrote: |
4 |
> Updating every 6/12 months is fine in principle, but it means going |
5 |
> though 10's of machines updating config files and resolving conflics. |
6 |
> This is a painful task, it's fine for 1 machine, it's fine for 5... but |
7 |
> you have any real number of servers to maintain and it ends up taking |
8 |
> hours or days to upgrade your servers. |
9 |
|
10 |
Yeah, your right. But there simple solution for this: update your servers |
11 |
every 3-4 days, and you will be surprised how ease and quick this task become. |
12 |
You'll need from a couple of seconds to 2-3 minutes in average for such update! |
13 |
Usually a few not important for you applications will be updated, which |
14 |
can't broke anything on your server, and which require few seconds to |
15 |
update their config files. Sometimes one of applications critical for your |
16 |
server become updated, and this require more attention, but it's much |
17 |
better to update ONE such important application instead of updating ALL of |
18 |
such important applications every 6-12 month. And this way you always can |
19 |
ease fallback to previous version of this application if something goes |
20 |
wrong on your server, add broken (for you) version to |
21 |
/etc/portage/package.mask, report bug and wait for next update. |
22 |
|
23 |
I've tried all these ways of updating my servers in last 2 years: |
24 |
update every few days, update only security issues, update every 6-12 months |
25 |
and found first way much more ease, effective and manageable than others. |
26 |
With two other ways I also wanna 'stable portage tree', with first way I |
27 |
don't need it - ARCH=x86 IS A 'stable portage tree' for me now. :) |
28 |
|
29 |
-- |
30 |
WBR, Alex. |
31 |
-- |
32 |
gentoo-server@g.o mailing list |