From: | Ronan Mullally <ronan@×××.ie> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-server@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-server] Best practices in managing large server groups | ||
Date: | Mon, 21 May 2007 14:57:27 | ||
Message-Id: | Pine.LNX.4.64.0705211551060.9909@office.4L | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-server] Best practices in managing large server groups by Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman |
1 | On Mon, 21 May 2007, Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman wrote: |
2 | |
3 | > But, of course, if they got access to the box, then the compiler is the |
4 | > least of your problems at that time, but I have to admit that the |
5 | > "slowing the attacker down" is an extra layer of protection. It provides |
6 | > the sysadmins/users/monitoring software more time to detect the breach. |
7 | |
8 | Removing development tools is one of just a range of security measures. |
9 | It is by no means the be-all and end-all of security - hence my mention of |
10 | security in depth. There are easily a couple of dozen security measures I |
11 | implement when installing a box. Removing development tools (or in most |
12 | cases, never installing them) is just one of them, but we diverge... |
13 | |
14 | Back to the original question. How do I run a number of gentoo boxes |
15 | without gcc (or a portage tree)? |
16 | |
17 | |
18 | -Ronan |
19 | -- |
20 | gentoo-server@g.o mailing list |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-server] Best practices in managing large server groups | Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman <buanzo@××××××××××.ar> |
Re: [gentoo-server] Best practices in managing large server groups | Justin Cataldo <jc@×××××××××××××.com> |
Re: [gentoo-server] Best practices in managing large server groups | Justin Cataldo <jc@×××××××××××××.com> |
Re: [gentoo-server] Best practices in managing large server groups | Justin Cataldo <jc@×××××××××××××.com> |
Re: [gentoo-server] Best practices in managing large server groups | Brian Kroth <bpkroth@××××.edu> |