| 1 |
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 3:45 PM, Petteri Räty <betelgeuse@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> Caleb Cushing wrote: |
| 4 |
> >> 3. Redesigning java-config in C++ |
| 5 |
> >> * It needs a rewrite any way and with paludis in C++ every Gentoo |
| 6 |
> >> system doesn't need python any more. |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > correct this to, rewrite in C, so it doesn't take half as long to |
| 9 |
> > compile, and so it's faster. or if someone really wants to, just let |
| 10 |
> > them pick one of the 2. |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> A student can of course try to convince me why it should be done in C |
| 14 |
> but it's not his/her choice. This project will not be accepted as done |
| 15 |
> unless but into production use so if the student disappears afterwards, |
| 16 |
> we are the ones ending up maintaining it. It's not a big project so |
| 17 |
> compile time is not an issue and java-config does not need to be |
| 18 |
> lightning fast. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> Regards, |
| 21 |
> Petteri |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Hello, |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
I am proposing as a student to create a new util based on the |
| 27 |
"universal select tool" wiki idea. My idea would be to create a tool |
| 28 |
to be used instead of java-config, ruby-config, binutils-config, |
| 29 |
gcc-config, xyz-config. What does java-config have so that a more |
| 30 |
general utility can't manage the java environment? |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
Cheers, |
| 33 |
Sérgio |
Archives