From: | Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [Bulk] [gentoo-user] Re: Udev update and persistent net rules changes | ||
Date: | Mon, 01 Apr 2013 13:15:23 | ||
Message-Id: | 20130401141217.333b5db0@digimed.co.uk | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [Bulk] [gentoo-user] Re: Udev update and persistent net rules changes by Pandu Poluan |
1 | On Mon, 1 Apr 2013 13:57:42 +0700, Pandu Poluan wrote: |
2 | |
3 | > I still don't understand what's so bad with MAC-based identification? I |
4 | > mean, uniqueness defined through MAC Address identity, the system name |
5 | > is just a label... |
6 | |
7 | MAC addresses are not human-friendly. It would be OK if you could set up |
8 | aliases, so your firewall rules could use enaabbccddeeff while you could |
9 | still type eth0. |
10 | |
11 | |
12 | -- |
13 | Neil Bothwick |
14 | |
15 | Don't just read the Tagline; read the MESSAGE! |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [Bulk] [gentoo-user] Re: Udev update and persistent net rules changes | Michael Mol <mikemol@×××××.com> |
Re: [Bulk] [gentoo-user] Re: Udev update and persistent net rules changes | Kevin Chadwick <ma1l1ists@××××××××.uk> |