Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Joost Roeleveld <joost@××××××××.org>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] [Less OT] Tally ho! - RC Flight Sims on Linux
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 08:04:47
Message-Id: 36953122.WCxaytvLTH@eve
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] [Less OT] Tally ho! - RC Flight Sims on Linux by microcai
1 On Monday 30 June 2014 15:40:02 microcai wrote:
2 > 在 2014年6月30日 星期一 09:17:02,Joost Roeleveld 写道:
3 >
4 > > On Monday 30 June 2014 01:26:48 wabenbau@×××××.com wrote:
5 > > > Am Sonntag, 29.06.2014 um 16:26
6 > > >
7 > > > schrieb Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com>:
8 > > > > wabenbau@×××××.com wrote:
9 > > > > > Am Sonntag, 29.06.2014 um 20:38
10 > > > > >
11 > > > > > schrieb Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk>:
12 > > > > >> On Sun, 29 Jun 2014 21:29:56 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
13 > > > > >>>> Please folks, stop that crap. It has nothing to do with gentoo or
14 > > > > >>>> computers at all. If you wanna discuss the delightfulness of war
15 > > > > >>>> machines then please to this at another place and not on this
16 > > > > >>>> list.
17 > > > > >>>
18 > > > > >>> Allow me to introduce your to my good friend "Delete" and his
19 > > > > >>> lovely wife "button"
20 > > > > >>
21 > > > > >> Or you could filter anything with OT in the subject to /dev/null.
22 > > > > >> It's not like this thread is masquerading as something relevant.
23 > > > > >
24 > > > > > That's not the point. If you wanna talk about stuff that's
25 > > > > > apparently absolut useless to almost every member of this ML, then
26 > > > > > you should do this at another place. Especially discussions with
27 > > > > > politically and or military background are IMHO absolutely
28 > > > > > inappropriate.
29 > > > > >
30 > > > > > But hey, maybe I'm wrong. Why shouldn't we talk here about
31 > > > > > everything that cross one's mind? We could mark it as OT in the
32 > > > > > subject line, so it should be no problem for everyone. Maybe we
33 > > > > > should discuss the local daily weather? I think, that's a pretty
34 > > > > > good idea as it would increase the noise level of this list even
35 > > > > > more. What do you think?
36 > > > >
37 > > > > Just a FYI. I have in the past asked questions about Windoze XP on
38 > > > > this very list. Why, I'm not joining a windoze mailing list for just
39 > > > > one question and I know a lot of people on this list know about
40 > > > > windoze as well. I have seen other topics raised on this list
41 > > > > before. It's not often but it does happen. I see Gentoo threads
42 > > > > that don't interest me at all and I just mark them as read and move
43 > > > > right along but I don't tell folks that I don't want to see them. I
44 > > > > could start with systemd. If I see systemd in the subject, I mark it
45 > > > > read and move right along usually without reading even the first
46 > > > > post. Why, I don't use systemd so I am certainly not interested in
47 > > > > it. There are other threads that I do the same thing with.
48 > > >
49 > > > That's right. But all examples you've mentioned are computer related
50 > > > topics and maybe useful for anyone on this list.
51 > >
52 > > We can turn this into a computer related thread.
53 > >
54 > > Anyone know of a way to get a flight-sim (for model planes) to run on
55 > > Linux?
56 > >
57 > > I have a legit copy of Realflight ( http://www.realflight.com ) and
58 > > occasionally have to boot into a legit copy (yes, all my software is 100%
59 > > legit) of MS Windows.
60 >
61 > X-plane ?
62
63 Not what I'm looking for.
64 That simulates 1:1 scale planes (full size).
65
66 I am talking about one I can use to practice flying without risking my real
67 planes on the first attempt. I need one where I can use my own transmitter
68 connected to the computer. There are cables to hook them up to the USB-port.
69
70 But the problem is finding a decent one that actually runs on Linux. All the
71 commercial ones I can find are MS Windows only.
72
73 --
74 Joost

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] [Less OT] Tally ho! - RC Flight Sims on Linux Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com>