1 |
On Sun, Dec 27, 2020 at 09:53:27AM +0000, Neil Bothwick wrote |
2 |
|
3 |
> I understand why someone used to GRUB would want to continue with |
4 |
> it on a UEFI system, but you have no experience of it so why are |
5 |
> you picking the boot manager that is hardest to configure, not to |
6 |
> mention the most bloated? |
7 |
> |
8 |
> Referencing your sig, GRUB is the desktop environment of boot |
9 |
> managers, the boot loader equivalent of emacs :) |
10 |
|
11 |
I believe grub only has to be set up once, unless you often change |
12 |
boot drives, etc. If it's "set it and forget it" for a single-user, |
13 |
single hard-drive system, I'm OK with a one-time complex set-up. |
14 |
|
15 |
My main objection to "desktop environments" is that they're full time |
16 |
resource hogs. Grub starts linux, and then goes away. KDE and GNOME |
17 |
chew up cpu cycles and ram 24/7. The reason I got a new machine is that |
18 |
a 12-year core2 duo with 3 gigs of ram doesn't cut it any more. The |
19 |
machine would be just as functional with grub as with lilo. On the |
20 |
other hand, KDE/GNOME would bring the machine to its knees. |
21 |
|
22 |
-- |
23 |
Walter Dnes <waltdnes@××××××××.org> |
24 |
I don't run "desktop environments"; I run useful applications |