Gentoo Archives: gentoo-alt

From: Sam Pfeiffer <sammypfeiffer@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-alt@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-alt] Re: Prefix CI status summary
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2020 09:53:08
Message-Id: CABVqfw_n9zv8uM4zUy0d+bBaLvG6nzi+D_Bs8zrezVpuHQOcZQ@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-alt] Re: Prefix CI status summary by Benda Xu
1 Hello,
2
3 Note that Haubi has set up some CI too here:
4 https://dev.azure.com/gentoo-prefix/ci-builds/_build?definitionId=1&_a=summary
5
6 They seem not successful right now, but they may need to be re-run as your
7 patch for the rsync issue was published recently.
8
9
10
11
12 On Mon, 27 Jan 2020 at 20:39, Benda Xu <heroxbd@g.o> wrote:
13
14 > Hi Sam,
15 > (Sending to the list)
16 >
17 > Sam Pfeiffer <sammypfeiffer@×××××.com> writes:
18 >
19 > > https://github.com/awesomebytes/gentoo_prefix_ci
20 > >
21 > > the README has a badge stating "Azure Pipelines succeeded".
22 > >
23 > > There is also a link in that README with the Azure pipelines page of
24 > > it: https://dev.azure.com/12719821/12719821/_build?definitionId=2
25 > >
26 > > I must note that my current bootstrapping there workarounds the rsync
27 > >problem and also has patched the STOP_AFTER_STAGE thing we are
28 > >discussing in the other thread.
29 > >
30 > > I'll try your patch now, and if it works in a fast machine I have
31 > > here, I'll undo my rsync patch in my CI.
32 > >
33 > > (I do need the CI passing so the subsequent images I create on
34 > > ros_overlay_over_gentoo_prefix can keep building updated).
35 >
36 > Thanks a lot!
37 >
38 > Are there plans to support more distributions, most notably RHEL? And
39 > is it feasible to integrate the CI results with
40 > https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Prefix/tested?
41 >
42
43 More distributions can be added, my only issue is that I'm consuming almost
44 all of my own free continuous integration Azure resources.
45 Do you have a Github organization that can host them? I could also run
46 other distributions say... once a week.
47
48 If you make a Github mirror of the Prefix repo we could also trigger CI
49 builds on every change of the prefix project (I think).
50
51 Adding the results to https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Prefix/tested should be
52 easily doable indeed. If there is some kind of API to update that page we
53 could even automate it
54 on every successful build. We could even add an extra column with a link to
55 an already built Gentoo Prefix for anyone to test & play.
56
57
58 >
59 > Yours,
60 > Benda
61 >
62 >
63
64 --
65
66 *Sammy Pfeiffer*
67 PhD Candidate at The Magic Lab within UTS.

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-alt] Re: Prefix CI status summary Michael Haubenwallner <haubi@g.o>