| 1 |
>> * it says it can work on all 3 OSS types |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> Windows one limited on Interix, very limited native windows, cross built |
| 4 |
> from Interix. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Wikipedia writes Interix only is build into enterprise editions, which |
| 8 |
sounds like |
| 9 |
a limitation. Do you see a GPL compatible way to get it running on standard |
| 10 |
editions? |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
>> Do you think gentoo prefix matches my requirements? |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Your application requests may need some work, though I'm not sure if the |
| 15 |
> overhead of Gentoo Prefix is worth your goals. Before you can e.g. just |
| 16 |
> get SVN, you've already installed yourself lots of stuff including a |
| 17 |
> compiler. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
The alternative would be, to store binary versions of apache and co. into |
| 20 |
SVN. That for different architectures. Maybe better. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
I think it doesn't matter if an automated build takes 15 minutes. You want |
| 23 |
do that every morning, but it is still much faster, than setting up a |
| 24 |
development environment by hand, especially a concrete one from the history. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> We always welcome that, provided that there is place for a long-time |
| 28 |
> commitment. Contributions are always more than welcome, of course. |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
Well if I decide to build that tool upon prefix, that automatically includes |
| 32 |
a long term commitment, even if only a few hours per month. My daily |
| 33 |
work, and probably that of others will depend upon, if the tool gets a |
| 34 |
success. |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
Regards |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
Al |
Archives