| 1 |
On 21-11-2007 07:55:04 -0600, Jeremy wrote: |
| 2 |
> True, and we are adding more obscure platforms often. I don't know how |
| 3 |
> many people use ia64-hpux for example, but it *seems* that I am one of |
| 4 |
> the few if only besides haubi because he has done alot of work on the |
| 5 |
> tree for me. I don't have time or resources to maintain a stable branch |
| 6 |
> by myself and report back to you. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Maybe here is a better solution: |
| 9 |
> Make the "auto-sync" script mark everything ~arch until it has been |
| 10 |
> tested by some members of the community then we could create a stabilize |
| 11 |
> request on b.g.o. - if people want to devote some time to it, they can |
| 12 |
> and they can lead the effort. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
That's sort of the current solution without stable keywords. If there |
| 15 |
are people that want to do the job, fine with me, syncing will always |
| 16 |
produce a new ~arch ebuild, not sure what I should do for the updates |
| 17 |
inside an ebuild (like an added patch - could break). Something tells |
| 18 |
me I should keep it stable if it was, otherwise I probably break the |
| 19 |
deptree. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Fabian Groffen |
| 24 |
Gentoo on a different level |
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
gentoo-alt@g.o mailing list |
Archives