| 1 |
On 02-09-2016 15:56:37 +0200, Michael Weiser wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hi Fabian, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 10:36:24AM +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote: |
| 5 |
> > > > !!! Section 'gentoo' in repos.conf has name different from repository name 'gentoo_prefix' set inside repository |
| 6 |
> > Well, the thing is, that the gentoo_prefix repo is different from the |
| 7 |
> > gentoo repo. So giving it the same name is conceptually wrong, |
| 8 |
> > confusing and also annoying if you happen to use both at the same time |
| 9 |
> > for it utterly confuses the package manager. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Okay, I didn't know that was even possible. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> > This problem needs a fix somehow though, but sine our portage is long |
| 14 |
> > behind mainline, it warrants updating and fixing it first before looking |
| 15 |
> > into fixing this problem IMO. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> Is there anything I can do to help without sinking a week into getting |
| 18 |
> up to speed on differences of prefix and standard portage and how to |
| 19 |
> rebase them to current? |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
I'm affraid not, I'll just have to find the time to merge. An extra |
| 22 |
trickyness is that since 2.3 they split out repoman into a separate |
| 23 |
thing, so I need to ensure our changes there move over. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Fabian |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
Fabian Groffen |
| 29 |
Gentoo on a different level |
Archives