Gentoo Archives: gentoo-alt

From: Sid Spry <sid@××××.us>
To: gentoo-alt@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-alt] Please Bump Arm64 Prefix Stage3
Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2020 17:56:30
Message-Id: 7415dbdb-69a0-49d2-a127-4195f57e59d2@www.fastmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-alt] Please Bump Arm64 Prefix Stage3 by Fabian Groffen
1 On Sat, Jun 13, 2020, at 11:41 AM, Fabian Groffen wrote:
2 > On 13-06-2020 09:58:38 -0500, Sid Spry wrote:
3 > > On Sat, Jun 13, 2020, at 8:58 AM, Fabian Groffen wrote:
4 > > > Then update your portage?
5 > >
6 > > ... I can't, it's blocked by EAPI version mistmatch. The stage3 is EAPI6. Most of the packages, and at least the most important ones like postage, are EAPI7.
7 >
8 > This sounds a lot like the scenario I recently had when I started up an
9 > old VM. In the old days, the upgrade path was kept around, but with the
10 > current generation of devs, this is considered bloat.
11 >
12 > I ended up just respinning the VM, reinstalling Gentoo from scratch. Is
13 > that something possible for you to do? Your only alternative is (most
14 > likely) installing a more recent Portage manually, or by hacking the
15 > ebuild to make it EAPI=5 and wading your way through warnings and errors
16 > until it manages to install. I would just do
17 > ebuild portage... digest clean merge
18 > for this, making changes wherever you need to just get the new portage
19 > installed. After that, probably --sync to wipe out any modifications
20 > you had to make.
21 >
22 > Thanks,
23 > Fabian
24 >
25 > --
26 > Fabian Groffen
27 > Gentoo on a different level
28 >
29 > Attachments:
30 > * signature.asc
31
32 I can try this later. Is there no way to trigger the release build machinery? I realize the files are hosted from an experimental dir but doubt their generation was entirely manual.
33
34 I would try to build a prefix stage3 myself (via bootstrap-prefix.sh?) but I am not sure I have an arm64 device that will work.

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-alt] Please Bump Arm64 Prefix Stage3 Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o>