1 |
On Sat, Jun 13, 2020, at 11:41 AM, Fabian Groffen wrote: |
2 |
> On 13-06-2020 09:58:38 -0500, Sid Spry wrote: |
3 |
> > On Sat, Jun 13, 2020, at 8:58 AM, Fabian Groffen wrote: |
4 |
> > > Then update your portage? |
5 |
> > |
6 |
> > ... I can't, it's blocked by EAPI version mistmatch. The stage3 is EAPI6. Most of the packages, and at least the most important ones like postage, are EAPI7. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> This sounds a lot like the scenario I recently had when I started up an |
9 |
> old VM. In the old days, the upgrade path was kept around, but with the |
10 |
> current generation of devs, this is considered bloat. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> I ended up just respinning the VM, reinstalling Gentoo from scratch. Is |
13 |
> that something possible for you to do? Your only alternative is (most |
14 |
> likely) installing a more recent Portage manually, or by hacking the |
15 |
> ebuild to make it EAPI=5 and wading your way through warnings and errors |
16 |
> until it manages to install. I would just do |
17 |
> ebuild portage... digest clean merge |
18 |
> for this, making changes wherever you need to just get the new portage |
19 |
> installed. After that, probably --sync to wipe out any modifications |
20 |
> you had to make. |
21 |
> |
22 |
> Thanks, |
23 |
> Fabian |
24 |
> |
25 |
> -- |
26 |
> Fabian Groffen |
27 |
> Gentoo on a different level |
28 |
> |
29 |
> Attachments: |
30 |
> * signature.asc |
31 |
|
32 |
I can try this later. Is there no way to trigger the release build machinery? I realize the files are hosted from an experimental dir but doubt their generation was entirely manual. |
33 |
|
34 |
I would try to build a prefix stage3 myself (via bootstrap-prefix.sh?) but I am not sure I have an arm64 device that will work. |